<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The next generation bends over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mortarandpixel.com/blog/2009/09/the-next-generation-bends-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mortarandpixel.com/blog/2009/09/the-next-generation-bends-over/</link>
	<description>the findings and observations of a Digital Channel Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vbrunetti</title>
		<link>http://mortarandpixel.com/blog/2009/09/the-next-generation-bends-over/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>vbrunetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mortarandpixel.com/blog/?p=173#comment-155</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy and understandable to feel the us vs. them mentality but think of what Mint gains. The way smaller agencies can&#039;t compete with the media -buying power of the big dogs, by being part of Intuit, Mint might be able to leverage their (combined) market presence to offer better deals with the in-application offers Mint provides. Let me be clear, I do think it is extremely difficult for a young/agile/small organization to change the culture of a larger/lumbering one. And this all might not work out. But successful mergers have worked in the past with a dynamic similar to this. Think of Adobe acquiring Macromedia. Macromedia needed the leverage Adobe could provide to fend off competing offerings from MSFT and others. We&#039;ll just have to see how the two cultures mix and whether or not the specialness of Mont can survive the often toxic atmosphere the old-guard can have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy and understandable to feel the us vs. them mentality but think of what Mint gains. The way smaller agencies can&#8217;t compete with the media -buying power of the big dogs, by being part of Intuit, Mint might be able to leverage their (combined) market presence to offer better deals with the in-application offers Mint provides. Let me be clear, I do think it is extremely difficult for a young/agile/small organization to change the culture of a larger/lumbering one. And this all might not work out. But successful mergers have worked in the past with a dynamic similar to this. Think of Adobe acquiring Macromedia. Macromedia needed the leverage Adobe could provide to fend off competing offerings from MSFT and others. We&#8217;ll just have to see how the two cultures mix and whether or not the specialness of Mont can survive the often toxic atmosphere the old-guard can have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
